Skip to main content

United Kingdom

View country profile

What has the NWS done so far (prior to the current Review Cycle)?

The 1998 Strategic Defence Review declared the UK’s total stockpile of fissile material as part of its commitment to the control of fissile material. This comprised 7.6 tonnes of plutonium; 21.9 tonnes of highly enriched uranium; and 15,000 tonnes of other forms of uranium.

The Review stated that 4.4 tons of plutonium, including 0.3 tons of weapons-grade plutonium, and over 9,000 tonnes of non-highly enriched uranium were no longer required for defence purposes and would be now be placed under European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) safeguards and made liable to inspection by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Moreover, the UK would cease exercising its right to withdraw fissile material from safeguarded stocks for nuclear weapons. The 4.4 tons of fissile material surplus to defence requirements, including 0.3 tonnes of weapons-grade plutonium, was transferred to the UK’s civilian plutonium stockpile.

The Review also stated that “All stocks of highly enriched uranium will, however, be retained outside safeguards, since material no longer needed for nuclear weapons will be used for the naval propulsion programme. We have considered whether further disaggregation of these totals at this time would be compatible with our continuing, if reduced, security requirement. We have concluded that it would not.”

The ‘Historical Accounting for UK Defence Highly Enriched Uranium’ published by the Ministry of Defence in 2006 reiterated that “MoD HEU is held outside international safeguards for defence purposes, but is subject to a strict materials accountancy regime”.

The UK confirmed in 2010 that this material was under European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) safeguards and liable to inspection by the International Atomic Energy Agency. The material is stored at the Sellafield nuclear site.

What is the NWS doing on this action in the current Review Cycle?

The UK has not declared any fissile material as no longer required for military purposes in the current review cycle.

In 2025 the Labour government stated a long-term intention to immobilise all UK-owned civilian plutonium.

Sources

  • Ministry of Defence. Historical Accounting for UK Defence Highly Enriched Uranium (London: 2006).
  • Ministry of Defence. The United Kingdom's Defence Nuclear Weapons Programme: Plutonium and Aldermaston – An Historical Account (London: 2000).
  • Ministry of Defence. The Strategic Defence Review (London: 1998).
  • Ambassador John Duncan. UK Statement to the 2010 Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference (United Nations, New York). 21 May 2010. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-statement-to-the-2010-non-proliferation-treaty-review-conference
  • Michael Shanks. Plutonium Disposition Strategy. House of Commons. 24 January 2025. https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2025-01-24/hcws388

United States

View country profile

What has the NWS done so far (prior to the current Review Cycle)?

Between the 2010 and 2020 NPT Review Conferences, the United States submitted to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) annual declarations of its holdings of civil unirradiated plutonium and the estimated amounts of plutonium contained in spent civil reactor fuel in excess of military requirements, in keeping with its commitment under the Guidelines for the Management of Plutonium (INFCIRC/549). These declarations did not include declarations relating to highly enriched uranium (HEU).

    • f hundreds of eligible facilities, only one U.S. facility––the K-Area Material Storage facility at the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site––has been under IAEA safeguards for decades and continued to remain under safeguards during the review period.

What is the NWS doing on this action in the current Review Cycle?

The United States’ most recent declaration of its holdings of civil unirradiated plutonium and the estimated amounts of plutonium contained in spent civil reactor fuel under INFCIRC/549 was transmitted to the IAEA in 2023. The declaration noted holdings of less than 0.05 metric tons of unirradiated separated plutonium produced during the course of manufacture or fabrication, 4.6 metric tons of plutonium contained in unirradiated MOX fuel, and 44.6 metric tons of unirradiated separated plutonium held elsewhere––all of which are roughly the same as the previous year’s figures.

During the current Review Cycle, the K-Area Material Storage facility at the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site has remained under IAEA safeguards.

Sources

United States of America. Communication Received from the United States of America Concerning Its Policies Regarding the Management of Plutonium. INFCIRC/549/Add.6-25. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2023. https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/infcircs/1998/infcirc549a6-25.pdf.

What has the NWS done so far (prior to the current Review Cycle)?

France indicated that it has no fissile material in excess of its defence requirements. Civilian fissile material is under the safeguards of the IAEA.

What is the NWS doing on this action in the current Review Cycle?

France indicated that it has no fissile material in excess of its defence requirements. Civilian fissile material is under the safeguards of the IAEA.

Sources

Working paper submitted by France. Nuclear disarmament: France’s concrete commitment Implementation by France of the “13 Practical Steps” contained in the 2000 Review Conference Final Document. NPT Review Conference (New York, 3-28 May 2010). May 2010. https://onu.delegfrance.org/IMG/pdf_Nuclear_Disarmament_-_13_Practical_Steps_of_2000.pdf